Am I the only one that refuses to believe that Yahoo! just arbitrarily decides the winner in the case of a tie??? I DO think that Yahoo! decides based upon one of two ways: 1. Whoever had gotten the first book wins OR 2. Whoever gets the last book wins.
In my opinion, either way works and thus rated tables should be kept, as it is a uniform decision across the tables. In the first option, it is virtually the same as playing another game and the first person taking the first book winning. In the second option, it seems only fair that if the person running out of cards can "come back" then they tie/win. I personally think that Yahoo! decides by the first option. In response to the comment it is arbitrary/based upon higher ranking, I completely disagree, as a gaming site with a reputation such as Yahoo! should not use that as the tiebreaker, as it does not make much sense.
Is there any way to get a clarification on the rules from Yahoo!??