Eliters - The Tournament League
Gin Rummy SHarbor  
 
Eliters - The Tournament League Main Leagues Events Clubs Help Register | Login
  YEPs US $ 0.00

  LEAGUES FORUM
Messages
Post Message
Polls
League Main

 MY ELITERS
My Game LeaguesMY LEAGUES
My Game TournamentsMY TOURNEYS
My Game StatsMY STATS
My ProfileMY PROFILE
My AccountMY ACCOUNT
My TicketsMY TICKETS

 Clubs Director:
golfinmimi4

Eliters is a Fun and Family League, No Gambling, Betting, or Wagering.
Eliters serves ads on its site in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Using our site means that you acknowledge acceptance of this policy.
12/17/2017 - 20:30  EST

  Message Game Help 
Message:
Search

Reply to:  257187  by  mainlake2 << Prev  257251  Next >> Reply | Post New
Re: Time For A Rule Change In Eds?? WeatherwLOLZ      9/28/2009 16:40

well here's my fountain change on THIS one. Read just the end paragraph for the short and sweet version

i do agree with main's argument (therefore i also agree with those that agree with him) but of course, now, its a matter of TO WHAT EXTENT.

First off let me say that i believe what mainlake is refering to is when the player's RECORDS are the same. Players can have the same amount of points while having different records. ie: Player 1: 3-0, Player 2: 2-3. That's where the first 2 rules in the help topic come into play

In general, i do agree with the idea that it is not truly fair the way it is currently set up. But the problem when it comes to designating a tie-breaker is that nomatter what, there really isnt a way to make it truly fair unless u accommodate for each player's specific feelings and requirements...which in turn would break the rules on numerous occasions. If for example it were as main and papa suggest (not saying i disagree with their idea) then we'd get a handful of people who say that "they beat better players than their opponent did and jus cuz they lost to THEM shouldnt mean they lose the tiebreaker" oss. Eventually we all just run around in circles.

But seeing as how this is NOT a sporting league (although the comparison was smart, when comparing it to a cards and games league it loses its power lol) i think a slightly different approach could be taken to ensure max possible fairness.......

If rules 1 and 2 of help topic 2623 are irrelevant in the situation at hand (If one or more players have the exact same record) then, if at all possible, it probably would be most helpful to tally the tiebreakers, including the ones suggested: Head2Head play, who beat higher ranked players (rule 3), Higher ranked player at the start of the division, and perhaps anything else that can be thought up. Whoever gets the majority of the tiebreakers takes it home. How do u guys think that would work, and tell me if i'm like.... way off or something...

basically all im saying is...The point being made is valid, but simply discarding the current rule and replacing it with another as suggested only seems to be a temporary solution



You are browsing messages in 'All Clubs'. To browse Gin Rummy SHarbor messages only, click here.
Leagues Badge
Christmas Bells
Standings
Premium Members
18th Anniversary
Special Offer
Promote Eliters
Invite your friends;
earn up to 1500 YEPs.
Enjoy Fun Games
Gold Box Spinners
Grids Puzzles
Home - About Us - TOS - Contact Us - Privacy - Site Map - Help
Tell a Friend - Make Home - Link to Us - Store - Advertising - Resources
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Eliters.com.  All rights reserved
Web Development Emox
Disclaimer: Eliters is a fun, friendly, and family tournament-based online League. Eliters Members can play online tournaments in many games of skill available on Free Play Sites on the Internet. Eliters is a non-gambling skill-based competition; No Gambling, Betting, or Wagering; Eliters is Free to all; you can register, participate in tournaments, and win points to continue playing forever completely Free.